by happyknot » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:08 am
Oh man I remember that Dollshe/Dollmore case.
Dollmore used to sell Dollshe dolls. Then one day they produced that model - it wasn't a recast in the sense that it was an exact copy. They had sculpted on top of the original body and changed the jointing system but it was still recognizable for what it had been. The damning evidence was that the inside featured casting marks from the original Dollshe body.
I felt very bad for Dollshe. They had even come on DOA to vent their feelings. You really came to understand how personal that had been. In this way we can see how recasters hurt the original artist.
~*~
I am sort of torn on this issue. It doesn't matter that I "really want" a Unoa - I am not entitled to it. The artist shouldn't have to undersell themselves or attempt to take on a larger number of orders than they can handle to satisfy people.
A reseller doesn't have to take my budget into account when selling their doll. They can look at the doll's availability, see that it's hard to get and drive the price up as long as there is a demand for it. Some accept layaway payments and even longer ones than the original company accepts. I think that's fair. If I really wanted the doll I definitely could afford layaway.
A recaster does what is illegal some even claim they MADE the doll. Even if they say they didn't make the original but are selling the copies it is still art theft.
Last edited by
happyknot on Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:36 am, edited 1 time in total.