Vetinari wrote:Sigh yeah - trying to argue science to widely-read non-scientists is difficult. Good job I didn't mention that I've actually visited a nuclear power station, that would probably have cemented my crazy status. It was about a week after Fukishima happened actually... The sense of resigned doom about jobs was obvious, but the visit was fascinating - we were stood in the pool room where the spent fuel rods were stored, and it was perfectly safe not 1 meter above the level of the water (if you were to fall in however that was another matter!)
I am very anti-OLD-style (Fukishima) nuke, and the completely unsafe ways that the spent fuel rods were stored. (Come on, double the safe capacity IN AN EARTHQUAKE ZONE????). But the proposed new reactors are a hundred times safer. What is needed is a safe storage system or a way to recycle the spent fuel rods. And one of the most virulent Green (and highly educated) anti-nuke campaigners reversed his stance a couple years ago over the new designs. The old plants must be replaced and there must be a better way of dealing with the spent fuel. For that, I am totally on board.