quidam wrote:After reading that review, I'm kind of wanting her again. I don't know if she'd go on my "must have" list, but would certainly be on the "nice to have" list.
While she isn't the most posable doll in the world, she really doesn't seem that bad. Plus, I do like her face. She's kind of charming.
Yeah, it made my feelings soften towards her as well. It's interesting to see The Toy Box Philosopher take a much more positive view on Lammily while still thinking the media surrounding her is silly. I respect Emily's opinion a lot, so it made me rethink what I have heard on this doll. The comments section is of course aflame with contrary opinions, which is interesting to see. I don't think Lammily will replace anyone in the doll world; however, I do think she will stick around and add some shape diversity that is a bit lacking in the readily accessible playdoll market...just as long as she survives once the huge hype surrounding her release dies down. And she gets some better articulation, clothes and more diversity.
I think I personally react negatively to the word 'average' because I have some neurological differences, so whenever anyone says 'average' or 'normal' in reference to something relating to humans I automatically think it excludes me, is unattainable to me, or worse, is trying to assimilate me. So the marketing slogan, "Average Is Beautiful" gives me the impression that the line is saying only 'normal' or '(neuro)typical' people are beautiful, rather than it being inclusive and saying that everyone is beautiful(which would have been a waaay better slogan). This is definitely not encouraging me to like Lammily. In fact, whenever I read that I think that Lammily is a huge, unaccepting jerk touting her average-everything over all of doll- and humankind.


End tangent.
